Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI & Technology
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Fitness
  • Gadgets
  • World
  • Marketing

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Exclusive—Gene Hamilton: Let’s Shut the Door on Woke AI

April 2, 2026

The hottest EVs from the 2026 New York Auto Show (plus one brawny concept)

April 2, 2026

Analyst Predicts Bitcoin Price Is Headed To $121,000 In 2 Months, But There’s A Problem

April 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About US
  • Advertise
  • Contact US
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
MNK NewsMNK News
  • Home
  • AI & Technology
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Fitness
  • Gadgets
  • World
  • Marketing
MNK NewsMNK News
Home » Supreme Court allows Trump to deport Venezuelans under wartime law
Politics

Supreme Court allows Trump to deport Venezuelans under wartime law

MNK NewsBy MNK NewsApril 7, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to use an 18th century wartime law to deport Venezuelan migrants, but said they must get a court hearing before they are taken from the United States.

In a bitterly divided decision, the court said the administration must give Venezuelans who it claims are gang members “reasonable time” to go to court.

But the conservative majority said the legal challenges must take place in Texas, instead of a Washington courtroom.

In dissent, the three liberal justices said the administration has sought to avoid judicial review in this case and the court “now rewards the government for its behavior.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined portions of the dissent.

The justices acted on the administration’s emergency appeal after the federal appeals court in Washington left in place an order temporarily prohibiting deportations of the migrants accused of being gang members under the rarely used Alien Enemies Act.

“For all the rhetoric of the dissents,” the court wrote in an unsigned opinion, the high court order confirms “that the detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.”

The case has become a flashpoint amid escalating tension between the White House and the federal courts.

Attorney General Pam Bondi called the court’s ruling “a landmark victory for the rule of law.”

“An activist judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction to seize control of President Trump’s authority to conduct foreign policy and keep the American people safe,” Bondi wrote in a social media post.

The original order blocking the deportations to El Salvador was issued by U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, the chief judge at the federal courthouse in Washington.

President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act for the first time since World War II to justify the deportation of hundreds of people under a presidential proclamation calling the Tren de Aragua gang an invading force.

Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of five Venezuelan noncitizens who were being held in Texas, hours after the proclamation was made public and as immigration authorities were shepherding hundreds of migrants to waiting airplanes.

Boasberg imposed a temporary halt on deportations and also ordered planeloads of Venezuelan immigrants to return to the U.S. That did not happen. The judge held a hearing last week over whether the government defied his order to turn the planes around. The administration has invoked a “ state secrets privilege ” and refused to give Boasberg any additional information about the deportations.

Trump and his allies have called for impeaching Boasberg. In a rare statement, Chief Justice John Roberts said “impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”

___

Associated Press writer Lindsay Whitehurst contributed to this report.





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
MNK News
  • Website

Related Posts

Trump uses Iran war address to make case for American patience

April 2, 2026

Republican plan to fund Homeland Security could get Thursday test vote

April 2, 2026

FACT FOCUS: False claims from Trump in address to the nation

April 1, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

James Anderson backs England for Australia revenge despite Ashes woes

April 1, 2026

Spanish police open probe into anti-Muslim chants at friendly match with Egypt

April 1, 2026

Iraq seal FIFA World Cup return after 40 years; Turkiye end 24-year drought

April 1, 2026

Turkiye end 24-year FIFA World Cup drought with win over Kosovo

April 1, 2026
Our Picks

Analyst Predicts Bitcoin Price Is Headed To $121,000 In 2 Months, But There’s A Problem

April 2, 2026

Past Patterns And Key Price Catalysts To Watch

April 2, 2026

Bitcoin ETFs See $1.32B March Inflows As ETH, XRP Funds Bleed

April 2, 2026

Recent Posts

  • Exclusive—Gene Hamilton: Let’s Shut the Door on Woke AI
  • The hottest EVs from the 2026 New York Auto Show (plus one brawny concept)
  • Analyst Predicts Bitcoin Price Is Headed To $121,000 In 2 Months, But There’s A Problem
  • Trump uses Iran war address to make case for American patience
  • Past Patterns And Key Price Catalysts To Watch

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
MNK News
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Home
  • About US
  • Advertise
  • Contact US
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 mnknews. Designed by mnknews.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.