Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI & Technology
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Fitness
  • Gadgets
  • World
  • Marketing

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

XRP Is Quietly Leaving Binance. A Hidden Signal Says Something Is Building Beneath It

April 1, 2026

Ethereum Price Recovery Picks Up, Is a Breakout Now Brewing?

March 31, 2026

Birthright citizenship case argued before Supreme Court

March 31, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About US
  • Advertise
  • Contact US
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
MNK NewsMNK News
  • Home
  • AI & Technology
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Fitness
  • Gadgets
  • World
  • Marketing
MNK NewsMNK News
Home » Birthright citizenship case argued before Supreme Court
Politics

Birthright citizenship case argued before Supreme Court

MNK NewsBy MNK NewsMarch 31, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is taking up one of the term’s most consequential cases, President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens. Trump plans to be in attendance.

In arguments Wednesday, the justices will hear Trump’s appeal of a lower-court ruling from New Hampshire that struck down the citizenship restrictions, one of several courts that have blocked them. They have not taken effect anywhere in the country.

A definitive ruling is expected by early summer.

Trump will be the first sitting president to attend oral arguments at the nation’s highest court.

The case frames another test of his assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court that has largely ruled in the president’s favor, but with some notable exceptions that Trump has responded to with starkly personal criticisms of the justices.

The birthright citizenship order, which Trump signed the first day of his second term, is part of his Republican administration’s broad immigration crackdown.

Birthright citizenship is the first Trump immigration-related policy to reach the court for a final ruling. The justices previously struck down global tariffs Trump had imposed under an emergency powers law that had never been used that way.

Trump reacted furiously to the late February tariffs’ decision, saying he was ashamed of the justices who ruled against him and calling them unpatriotic.

He issued a preemptive broadside against the court on Sunday on his Truth Social. “Birthright Citizenship is not about rich people from China, and the rest of the World, who want their children, and hundreds of thousands more, FOR PAY, to ridiculously become citizens of the United States of America. It is about the BABIES OF SLAVES!,” the president wrote. “Dumb Judges and Justices will not a great Country make!”

Trump’s order would upend the longstanding view that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, and federal law since 1940 confer citizenship on everyone born on American soil, with narrow exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.

The 14th Amendment was intended to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship, though the Citizenship Clause is written more broadly. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” it reads.

In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down the executive order as illegal, or likely so, under the Constitution and federal law. The decisions have invoked the high court’s 1898 ruling in Wong Kim Ark, which held that the U.S.-born child of Chinese nationals was a citizen.

The administration argues that the common view of citizenship is wrong, asserting that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.

The court should use the case to set straight “long-enduring misconceptions about the Constitution’s meaning,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote.

No court has accepted that argument, and lawyers for pregnant women whose children would be affected by the order said the Supreme Court should not be the first to do so.

“We have the president of the United States trying to radically reinterpret the definition of American citizenship,” said Cecillia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union legal director who is facing off against Sauer at the Supreme Court.

More than one-quarter of a million babies born in the U.S. each year would be affected by the executive order, according to research by the Migration Policy Institute and Pennsylvania State University’s Population Research Institute.

While Trump has largely focused on illegal immigration in his rhetoric and actions, the birthright restrictions also would apply to people who are legally in the United States, including students and applicants for green cards, or permanent resident status.

___

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
MNK News
  • Website

Related Posts

Trump criticizes European allies about the Iran war

March 31, 2026

Trump signs order directing creation of a national voter list

March 31, 2026

Judge orders Trump administration to halt construction of ballroom

March 31, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Fakhar Zaman suspended for two PSL matches for ball-tampering

March 31, 2026

Raza admits hosting visitors but cites lack of awareness of new PSL rules

March 30, 2026

Fast bowler Naseem Shah slapped with Rs20m fine after social media post about Punjab CM Maryam

March 30, 2026

Lahore Qalandars imposes Rs1 million fine on captain Shaheen Afridi over security protocol breach

March 30, 2026
Our Picks

XRP Is Quietly Leaving Binance. A Hidden Signal Says Something Is Building Beneath It

April 1, 2026

Ethereum Price Recovery Picks Up, Is a Breakout Now Brewing?

March 31, 2026

Bitcoin Price Recovery at Risk, Sellers Prepare to Reassert Control

March 31, 2026

Recent Posts

  • XRP Is Quietly Leaving Binance. A Hidden Signal Says Something Is Building Beneath It
  • Ethereum Price Recovery Picks Up, Is a Breakout Now Brewing?
  • Birthright citizenship case argued before Supreme Court
  • Bitcoin Price Recovery at Risk, Sellers Prepare to Reassert Control
  • Trump criticizes European allies about the Iran war

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
MNK News
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Home
  • About US
  • Advertise
  • Contact US
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 mnknews. Designed by mnknews.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.